Archive for category Science & Technology

Could we survive an EMP attack?

Nuclear_fireball

In my never-ending hunt for apocalyptic novels of any kind, I’ve recently read One Second After, by William R. Forstchen. As a work of fiction, I can say I found it to be rather mediocre. Admittedly fun, but mediocre nonetheless. The reason I mention this is that I did find the issues raised by One Second After to be of critical importance, and it taught me a lot about a shadowy topic that truly threatens the safety of the western world: Large scale Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) attack.

What is an EMP?

For those who haven’t watched Tom Cruise in War of the Worlds, an EMP, or Electromagnetic Pulse, is a brief ultra-powerful electromagnetic surge that destroys virtually all electronics in its path (EMPs travel through the air, just like any other electromagnetic waves). EMPs were discovered sometime mid last century through nuclear tests conducted at the height of the cold war. As a side effect of the nuclear blasts, it was discovered that a ultra-high-energy surge gets released, and that this surge has a devastating effect on all electronics within its range: city power grids, phone systems, and almost any other electronic device within range gets immediately “bricked”. More importantly, when a nuclear weapon is detonated in high altitude, something called the Compton effect comes into play. This means that much more of the nuclear weapon’s energy goes into an EMP than it would have otherwise, resulting in a far more powerful EMP.

The end result is that a small nuclear device detonated in high altitude can cripple any electronics in a radius of over 1000 km, without causing any direct human casualties. Just to put this in perspective, the estimate is that two or three such devices detonated in the atmosphere could essentially cripple all electronics in an area as large as the continental United States. If losing all power and electronics sounds harmless or somehow minor, it is not. An EMP would disable all modern day communications, transportation, and electronics. This means no cars, no planes, no phones, no Internet, no computers, etc. Our increased reliance on technology, coupled with the the huge impacted area means that the potential effect this could have on a western society is absolutely devastating.

Imagine a situation where one day, without warning, all electronics shut down, all cars die, and essentially all technology becomes useless. Additionally, these devices would not be fixable — definitely not in the short term, and most likely not even in the long term. On the most immediate level, the meaning is that the only food you’d have access to is whatever is walking distance from your present position. Now imagine that unless you happen to live in an agricultural area, that food would most likely last for no more than a couple of days. Add that to the fact that no one would be coming — all form of government would come to an instant halt without communications… Starting to get the picture?

Just to give an idea, One Second After describes such an attack over the United States, and describes how within weeks after the attack starvation becomes commonplace and barbaric tribes are formed, looting and scavenging for any food they can get their hands on. I honestly don’t think that’s an exaggeration. Western societies rely so heavily on technology that at this point we’ve simply forgotten how to live without it.

How Likely is it?

The next question we must ask ourselves is, how difficult would it be for terrorists or rouge nations to carry out such an attack? Unfortunately, the answer is that it’s not that difficult. The fact is that it is within the means of any nation equipped with ballistic missiles and nuclear warheads. From the enemy’s standpoint this might be a far more effective use of their nuclear arsenal because it causes widespread devastation, unlike a conventional atmospheric detonation of a typical nuclear weapon, which can generally destroy a large city, at the most. Sure, the destruction of an entire city sounds unthinkable and horrifying, but it most likely wouldn’t defeat a powerful nation. A large scale EMP can easily disable even the largest and most powerful countries, possibly for good.

What Can Be Done?

While completely defending against EMPs is impractical, it turns out that there are relatively cheap ways for governments to prepare and minimize the potential damage. For example, power plants and communication systems can be hardened against EMPs. So can vehicles and commercial airliners. The point is that this is one of those things where governments can invest a little bit right now and dramatically minimize the potential damage caused by this kind of attack. At the very minimum, be prepared to the point of having the ability to recover from such an attack, should it ever take place.
As an individual, there is very little we can do, other than complain to our governments and drive them to action. My only advice would have been to buy EMP-hardened cars and radios, but those don’t appear to exist…

Learn More

If you’d like to learn more, you could give One Second After a read to get a more dramatized view of the potential consequences, with some decent entertainment value. Alternatively, if you prefer the raw details you could take a look at the executive report written by the EMP Commission. It’s not as dramatic, but it’s just as scary…

Tags: , , , , ,

Superconductors and global warming.

There’s not much that hasn’t been written about superconductivity, that curious physical phenomenon that allows certain materials to conduct electricity with %100 efficiency. In some science fiction books such as Larry Niven’s renowned Ringworld series, superconductivity is described as THE quantum leap — the chasm that, when crossed, marks a new era for society. Still, I think a brief reminder of why this technology is so exciting is in order.

Superconductors are exciting because they represent a seemingly impossible goal in our world: %100 efficiency. With superconductors it becomes possible to build electric motors and power generators that have virtually zero energy loss. This means that such devices would produce virtually no heat. Simply put, superconductors are our direct path to an elegant, permanent solution to our energy problems.

To give an idea, today’s power plants use conventional copper-based generators, which means that by definition they can never go above roughly %50 efficiency. This may sound like a minute technical detail, but it is not. It means that a typical 2 gigawatt/hour power plant is actually releasing the same amount of energy (2 gigawatt/hour in this example) in the form of heat! That’s one of the reasons why power plants are almost always placed near oceans or other massive water reservoirs. Massive amounts of water are required in order to cool the generators down, which is the same thing as saying that the generators are used for heating the water up. This means that globally, we have literally terawatts of heat going straight into our oceans at all times, just because of generator inefficiency!

Fix this problem, and you can build clean nuclear power plants that produce plenty of energy with virtually zero emissions and extremely low heat byproduct. Such plants would have a very minor environmental footprint, certainly compared to today’s power plants.

At the other end, superconductors would allow us to build super efficient electric vehicles, as well as possibly ultra-efficient batteries for storing energies in them (using Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage or SMES). In most types of electrical devices, superconductors promise far lower energy usage with dramatically lower heat emissions.

Bottom line? It would require some significant research, but it would be safe to say that superconductors promise dramatic breakthroughs in our ability to generate, store, and utilize energy.

The problem? No one has found a way to make superconductors work in room temperatures yet. They currently require extremely low temperatures in the order of -100 to -200 celsius in order to function. There have been countless “near breakthroughs”, but the problem remains unresolved. I find the relative lack of political and media interest in this technology puzzling, especially since it seems like solving this problem would most likely rid us almost completely of our dependency on oil.

One question that comes to mind is whether this slow progress is due to the scientific challenge being truly insurmountable, or perhaps it’s just due to lack of research funding due to various political agendas. Without getting into oil-industry related conspiracy theories (though I’m really into that kind of stuff), I’ll say that it would be great to see money and resources invested in this issue. I can think of no other technological solution that promises to solve our energy problems as elegantly as superconductors.

Having said that, Obama: Any chance we can still find a billion dollars or so in the scientific research budget of that stimulus plan of yours? I’ll be waiting for your response… :-)